• Comment

Dog-eat-dog battle hurts others

Posted: October 24, 2013 - 9:37am

Imagine two well established packs of dogs (say pack R and pack D), roaming  the streets. As territorial critters are wont to do, they pee on walls and prominent objects in order to mark the borders of their respective homelands.  

In the areas of their territory which are disputed, one finds an abundance of “marking” because, as one group comes and goes leaving their mark, soon the other group returns to the site and, knowing that the opposition has recently been there, once again lifts their legs in defiance.

There also are other less established groups (say packs I, G and T) which weave in and out of these territories unable to make a firm claim on any neighborhood, yet marking as they go, hoping to find a block or two not sufficiently protected and therein gain strength and recognition. 

Occasionally, packs R and D meet in a disputed area.  Being of nearly equal strength and numbers, and imagining the injury which would most likely occur to both packs — not to mention the potential for the lesser known packs to  gain strength — neither  is willing to risk all out battle. At these times, the howling and snapping and marking intensify. This restrained and calculated conflict continues for an extended period of time until it is obvious that, while expending much energy and resources and occasionally drawing blood from innocent locals and passersby who are unable to defend themselves, nothing is being gained and they must silently, instinctually agree to retreat to their respective safe areas to lick their minor wounds.   

In their sanctuaries they can console themselves in the fact that, while they did not make any gains in territory, they suffered only minor injuries to themselves. The only real damages were to those locals who happened to be caught in the wrong place at the wrong time and were bitten by members of both packs — not to mention the stench from the abundant marking which we must all now live with, the scent so strong and unpleasant that it is noticed by others many miles away. 

Cal Schmidt

  • Comment

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
kearbear 10/25/13 - 08:05 am
Who let the dogs out?

Who let the dogs out?

natural born anthropologist
natural born anthropologist 10/25/13 - 09:26 pm

I think it was the Homo-mudslinger-guttersnipes, anthropologically speaking, like you Kearbear.

Natural Born Anthropolgist

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/320038/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/319323/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/319083/
  • title http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/318768/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/318673/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/318368/
  • title http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/317873/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/317838/
Lupin bloom at the head of the bay


  • 3482 Landings St.
  • (907) 235-7767
  • Fax: (907) 235-6571
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback