• Comment

Fourth-place candidate asks for recount of city election

Posted: October 7, 2013 - 1:07pm  |  Updated: October 8, 2013 - 9:04am

Even though he finished 255 votes behind Bryan Zak, the second-place candidate in the Homer City Council election, Justin Arnold last Friday filed an application asking for a hand recount of the Oct. 1 city election. Zak, a two-term incumbent council member, won re-election last week when the Canvass Board counted absentee and other ballots, giving Zak an 11-vote lead over Corbin Arno. Arno had a four-vote lead on election day, but Zak finished with 547 votes to Arno’s 536 votes. VanDyke was the top vote-getter with 651 votes in the two-seat election. Arnold finished fourth with 292 votes.

“It’s a very close election between Corbin and Bryan Zak,” Arnold said as to why he asked for a recount. “It would be beneficial to the entire community.”

Arnold also organized the initiative to repeal the ban on retailers providing onion-skin thin plastic bags to customers. That repeal won by 661 to 519 votes. Arnold said he had talked to Arno about the recount, but did it on his own. He asked the city to provide notice of the recount to him and Arno.

Homer City Clerk Jo Johnson said the recount will start at 1 p.m. Tuesday in the Cowles Council Chambers, City Hall. It is a public meeting and open to anyone. The city council will certify the election at its regular meeting starting at 6 p.m. Monday.

Homer city code follows the same procedures set out in state law for requesting a recount. Under Alaska statutes, a defeated candidate or 10 qualified voters who believe there has been a mistake made by an election official can file an application for a recount. If the difference is 20 votes or less, then the city pays for the recount, which includes the cost of paying election officials and city workers.

In addition to a hand recount, Arnold asked that ballots be placed in Homer Police custody. The ballots are now in the Homer City Hall vault, Johnson said. Those issues are not addressed in state statutes.

“I’ve never really trusted the idea of putting all our trust in a fallible machine made by man,” Arnold said in asking for a hand recount.

After consulting with city attorney Thomas Klinkner, Johnson said those requests will be denied. The city will keep custody of the ballots in the vault and not do a hand recount.

A human recount wouldn’t necessarily be more accurate. For example, at the Canvass Board meeting last Friday when election officials hand-tallied 10 faxed or emailed ballots, there had been an initial discrepancy in the count when votes were read aloud and one official mistakenly heard “Arno” for “Arnold.”

All other ballots were run through the city’s AccuVote machines. AccuVote is a brand name for a voting machine made by Premier/Diebold that counts paper ballots where voters fill in bubbles next to the selected candidate or referendum choice.

“That’s what we have the AccuVote units for,” Johnson said of not doing a hand count. “That’s why we pay to have the cards programmed.”

Before counting actual ballots, the AccuVote machine is programmed for each election, and dummy ballots with various scenarios — say, voting for three candidates in a two-seat race — are run to test the machines.

The cost of a recount shouldn’t be too high, Arnold said.

“I don’t think it’s going to be any large amount of money considering the things they spend money on, like $20,000 to work on a trail they don’t even have the property for,” Arnold said.

Johnson said this is the first recount she knows of in the past 10 years. 

The canvass board on Friday did disqualify 20 of 36 questioned ballots. Disqualified ballots were for voters who did not appear on registration rolls as being city residents. The qualified questioned ballots were for city voters who voted at the wrong precinct, for example, showed up at Homer City Hall instead of the Homer Senior Center. To preserve voter secrecy, those ballots were separated from questioned ballot envelopes and counted with absentee ballots.

A message was left with Arno seeking comment, but he did not return a call by press time.

Michael Armstrong can be reached at michael.armstrong@homernews.com.


  • Comment

Comments (1) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Reality Bites
Reality Bites 10/08/13 - 08:21 am

There is no reason in America, where our votes are the basis of our democracy, that we need to count ballots on privately owned (with secret source code) electronic voting machines.

This is a problem both nationally and locally and there is absolutely no good explanation.

I realize the educational system has gone downhill, but can't we count? How long does it take to count a few thousand votes? Are we really that incompetent that we cannot take a few hours (at the most!) to make sure the machines are counting accurately?

In Alaska in particular, most precincts are just a few hundred people. However the election workers are not allowed to look at the ballots ever! You only put them through the preprogrammed diebold accuvote machines and trust that the code is honest.

If there is a recount, they are put through the same machines. Complete idiocy set up for fraudulent elections.

Why can't we count? Since when do we just trust secret software? In this case, it is because we already paid for the programming, we must do a recount with the same programming.

It makes no sense to do a recount with the same possibly manipulated software. If the city has nothing to hide, then why not double check the machines with a hand count. Even if this election is fair, this is not a good precedent to follow.

This issue needs to go all the way to the top, to where the entire state is hand counted. There is no excuse to use machines that are easily manipulated. Are we lazy or just stupid?

In 2004, we had 200% voter turnout in 16 out of 40 Alaskan districts. Since this is impossible, there was obviously fraud but absolutely nothing has been done to remedy the situation.

With such an important election coming up in 2014, with the oil referendum on the ballot, Parnell's possible reelection and our state needing to rid itself of the overtly corrupt legislature, it would be wise to expose these election issues before next year.

Thank you Justin Arnold! A true patriot!!!

Back to Top

Latest Updates


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/320038/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/319323/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/319083/
  • title http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/318768/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/318673/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/318368/
  • title http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/317873/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/317838/
Lupin bloom at the head of the bay


  • 3482 Landings St.
  • (907) 235-7767
  • Fax: (907) 235-6571
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback