• Comment

Homer man charged in rare DUI marijuana case

Posted: April 10, 2013 - 12:19pm

Alaska State Troopers last week charged a Homer man for driving under the influence. That in itself isn’t rare, but the nature of the alleged intoxication is: troopers claimed Paul Frary, 24, was under the influence of marijuana and nothing else. Also unusual is the time between when the incident happened, July 11, 2011, and when charges were filed.

According to a criminal complaint filed April 2, on July 11, 2011m Trooper Daniel Brom encountered Frary when Brom went to a single-car crash near Mile 165.1 Sterling Highway south of Anchor Point. Brom found a black Ford 350 pickup truck in the ditch that had crashed into a tree. He identified Frary as the driver. Emergency medical technicians were pulling Frary from the truck.

“Frary had incoherent speech and nothing could be made out from anything he tried to say,” Brom wrote in the complaint.

Brom said he saw a pipe that smelled of burnt marijuana on the dashboard. EMTs took Frary to South Peninsula Hospital, where he consented to a blood draw. Troopers served a warrant on the blood and it tested 5.7 nanograms per milliliter for tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, and 64.8 ng/mL of carboxy-THC. Carboxy-THC, while not intoxicating, can indicate recent marijuana use.

While Alaska law sets an intoxication level for alcohol at a blood-alcohol level of .08, the law doesn’t set specific levels for marijuana. Alaska Statute 28.35.030(a), the law Frary was charged with violating, says a person commits the crime of driving under the influence if the driver operates a vehicle, watercraft or aircraft “while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage, intoxicating liquor, inhalant, or any controlled substance, singly or in combination.”

Brom also found a second marijuana pipe that allegedly tested positive for about .2 grams of marijuana. Frary also was charged with sixth-degree misconduct involving a controlled substance.

As states legalize marijuana, legislatures and citizens have debated legal limits for driving under the influence while high on pot. Under a ballot initiative last fall legalizing marijuana in Washington, the initiative allowing adults to possess up to 1 ounce of marijuana also made it a DUI if the THC content in a driver’s blood is 5 nanograms per milliliter — less than the amount Frary allegedly tested.

The Colorado House of Representatives also recently passed a bill setting a legal limit for THC in a driver’s bloodstream at that same number, 5 nanograms.

How much pot is that? The Washington ballot initiative legalizing marijuana, I-502, cited data from car crashes in Australia which indicated the risk of a crash rises when a driver is stoned at between 3.5 and 5 nanograms, wrote Johnathan Martin of the Seattle Times. Martin mentioned a federal study that said THC fell below 5 nanograms within hours of smoking a one-gram joint — but that was for government-grown pot. 

The degree of intoxication with marijuana varies with the quality of pot and how it’s consumed. According to the National Highway Safety Administration’s “Drugs and Human Performance Fact Sheets,” the average THC concentration in marijuana is 1 to 5 percent, hashish is 5 to 15 percent and hashish oil is 20 percent. Sinsemilla marijuana made from unpollinated female plants has a THC contest of 17 percent. “Recreational doses are highly variable and users often titer (adjust) their own dose,” the report notes.

Trooper spokesperson Megan Peters said sometimes it takes time for defendants to be charged while an investigation is being completed.

“Are you going to just move forward with a case if you don’t have all your ducks in a row?” she said. “Why rush it? Do a good job first and foremost.”

As to why it took two years to file charges, Peters referred that question to the Kenai District Attorney, Scot Leaders. Leaders did not return a phone message or email message. seeking comment on the case.

Michael Armstrong can be reached at michael.armstrong@homernews.com.

  • Comment

Comments (5) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
rms907 04/11/13 - 02:03 pm
I'm not promoting impaired

I'm not promoting impaired driving yet I have a simple question, is it "normal" to speak coherently while being pulled from a crashed vehicle?

motleyalaskan 04/11/13 - 03:14 pm

“Frary had incoherent speech and nothing could be made out from anything he was trying to say"...

I'm sorry, but over the years ( since '66) I've seen folks who had been smoking ALL DAY LONG, and never ONCE saw that, unless there were other bad drugs like alcohol or pills etc also involved.....please update your tests or stop making such ridiculous propaganda....it ain't workin'!

wings 04/12/13 - 06:35 pm
Not conclusive evidence to cause being marijuana

Someone seems eager to find a way to stop the use of marijuana, but most users already know this story is inconclusive for the culprit of an accident to be marijuana. Many things could have happened to the driver that would cause an accident, even a psychological impairment where drug testing isn't sufficient. Plus, has anyone ever been in an accident where speech is in perfect control, or could it be this person was just in shock?

georgia 04/14/13 - 12:38 pm
Kenai District Attorney, Scot Leaders

After hitting a tree, it's not surprising, "Frary had incoherent speech and nothing could be made from anything he tried to say....." The article did say, Frary cooperated at the hospital to blood draws. A sympathetic jury might understand incoherent speech pattern after a crash into a tree. Get lawyered up to find out what happened to due process, and why did it take two years to file charges?

LaFern 04/16/13 - 06:22 pm
Common sense

People want to legalize marijuana? Fine. By all means, have at it. But people who refuse to believe that marijuana causes pronounced intoxication are just kidding themselves. There is no anti-marijuana "conspiracy", and even in states where possession is legal people who high drive are just as dangerous as people who drunk drive.

Back to Top

Latest Updates


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/320038/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/319323/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/319083/
  • title http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/318768/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/318673/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/318368/
  • title http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/317873/ http://spotted.homernews.com/galleries/317838/
Lupin bloom at the head of the bay


  • 3482 Landings St.
  • (907) 235-7767
  • Fax: (907) 235-6571
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback